// API callback
recentpostslist({"version":"1.0","encoding":"UTF-8","feed":{"xmlns":"http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom","xmlns$openSearch":"http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/","xmlns$blogger":"http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008","xmlns$georss":"http://www.georss.org/georss","xmlns$gd":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005","xmlns$thr":"http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0","id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227"},"updated":{"$t":"2021-12-31T13:02:08.362-08:00"},"category":[{"term":"Current Affairs"},{"term":"Ideals"},{"term":"Unequal World"},{"term":"Economics (the science)"},{"term":"History"},{"term":"Marx"},{"term":"Big Banks \u0026 Finance"},{"term":"Covid-19"},{"term":"United States"},{"term":"Michael Roberts"},{"term":"Tricontinental"},{"term":"1917-1989"},{"term":"Vijay Prashad"},{"term":"Prabhat Patnaik"},{"term":"David F. Ruccio"},{"term":"Trump"},{"term":"Branko Milanovic"},{"term":"Robin Eric Hahnel"},{"term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"term":"Asad Zaman"},{"term":"India"},{"term":"Jack Rasmus"},{"term":"Milton's Myths"},{"term":"Environment"},{"term":"Nick Johnson"},{"term":"Africa"},{"term":"Chris Dillow"},{"term":"Labor movements"},{"term":"book review"},{"term":"Michael Hudson"},{"term":"Venezuela"},{"term":"Anwar Shaikh"},{"term":"Big Tech"},{"term":"Blair Fix"},{"term":"Brazil"},{"term":"Dean Baker"},{"term":"Jayati Ghosh"},{"term":"Jonathan Nitzan"},{"term":"Racism"},{"term":"Shimshon Bichler"},{"term":"Tony Norfield"},{"term":"Catalonia Special"},{"term":"Doug Henwood"},{"term":"Iran"},{"term":"Johanna Bockman"},{"term":"Keynes"},{"term":"Prabir Purkayastha"},{"term":"Samir Amin"},{"term":"The Amin Interview"},{"term":"William I. Robinson"},{"term":"Aaron Bastani"},{"term":"Alex Thomas"},{"term":"Anders Sandström"},{"term":"Apple"},{"term":"Argentina"},{"term":"Big Pharma"},{"term":"Brexit"},{"term":"Catherine Samary"},{"term":"Celina della Croce"},{"term":"Eleanor Marx"},{"term":"Europe"},{"term":"Four Economists Reply"},{"term":"Frederick Engels"},{"term":"IMF"},{"term":"Justin Podur"},{"term":"Lucia Huber"},{"term":"Medea Benjamin"},{"term":"Paul Cockshott"},{"term":"Richard D. Wolff"},{"term":"Rosa Luxemburg"},{"term":"Socialist Economist"},{"term":"South Africa"},{"term":"cryptocurrencies"},{"term":"feminism"},{"term":"Aabid Firdausi"},{"term":"Afghanistan"},{"term":"Alejandro Valle Baeza"},{"term":"Alex Lawson"},{"term":"Alexandra Kollontai"},{"term":"An Ansom"},{"term":"Bill Jefferies"},{"term":"Bitcoin"},{"term":"Boaventura Monjane"},{"term":"Bolsonaro"},{"term":"CP Chandrasekhar"},{"term":"Cahal Moran"},{"term":"China"},{"term":"Climate Change"},{"term":"Colombia"},{"term":"Cuba"},{"term":"Dante Dallavalle"},{"term":"David McNally"},{"term":"Diane Archer"},{"term":"E. Ahmet Tonak"},{"term":"Elvire Thouvenot"},{"term":"Español"},{"term":"Facebook"},{"term":"Fascism"},{"term":"Germany"},{"term":"Ghana"},{"term":"Gino Brunswijck"},{"term":"Gloria Martínez González"},{"term":"Group of Colombian Critical Thought"},{"term":"Gyekye Tanoh"},{"term":"Heiner Flassbeck"},{"term":"Immanuel Ness"},{"term":"Immanuel Wallerstein"},{"term":"Iraq"},{"term":"Jason Chrysostomou"},{"term":"Joe Biden"},{"term":"John Bolton"},{"term":"K. Hemalata"},{"term":"Katy Fox-Hodess"},{"term":"Kerala"},{"term":"Latin America"},{"term":"Lena Gronbach"},{"term":"Luis Enrique Gavazut"},{"term":"Manuel Bertoldi"},{"term":"Mark Weisbrot"},{"term":"Marshall Auerback"},{"term":"Mexico"},{"term":"Middle East"},{"term":"Mireia Vehí \u0026 Albert Noguera"},{"term":"Nancy J. Altman"},{"term":"Nate Singham"},{"term":"Ndongo Samba Sylla"},{"term":"Neoliberalism"},{"term":"Nicolas J.S. Davies"},{"term":"Nils Brandsma"},{"term":"Noam Chomsky"},{"term":"North Korea"},{"term":"Oil"},{"term":"Pakistan"},{"term":"Paul Volcker"},{"term":"Peterloo"},{"term":"Piketty"},{"term":"Puerto Rico"},{"term":"Ronaldo Munck"},{"term":"Sam Nicholls"},{"term":"Seth Ackerman"},{"term":"Slavery"},{"term":"Subin Dennis"},{"term":"Suresh Naidu"},{"term":"S’bu Zikode"},{"term":"Tanya Rawal-Jindia"},{"term":"Thom Hartmann"},{"term":"Tinashe Nyamunda"},{"term":"Tithi Bhattacharya"},{"term":"Trade War"},{"term":"United Kingdom"},{"term":"Utsa Patnaik"},{"term":"Valerie Vande Panne"},{"term":"Vicenç Navarro"},{"term":"William G. Mosely"},{"term":"William O. Pate II"},{"term":"Yadul Krishna"},{"term":"Yair Kaldor"},{"term":"Zambia"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Socialist Economist"},"subtitle":{"type":"html","$t":""},"link":[{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/posts\/summary"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/summary\/-\/Marx?alt=json-in-script\u0026start-index=3\u0026max-results=500"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/search\/label\/Marx"},{"rel":"hub","href":"http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"},{"rel":"previous","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/summary\/-\/Marx\/-\/Marx?alt=json-in-script\u0026start-index=1\u0026max-results=500"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"generator":{"version":"7.00","uri":"http://www.blogger.com","$t":"Blogger"},"openSearch$totalResults":{"$t":"31"},"openSearch$startIndex":{"$t":"3"},"openSearch$itemsPerPage":{"$t":"500"},"entry":[{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-2926575410557707685"},"published":{"$t":"2019-12-14T09:28:00.001-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-12-14T09:56:40.067-08:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Tony Norfield"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Unequal World"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Rate of Profit, Finance \u0026 Imperialism"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ TONY NORFIELD` ╱ ± 16 minutes\n\n\n\n\n An expression for the system rate of profit.\n\n\n\n\n\nThere has been little attempt to examine the relationship of finance to imperialism. Here I offer a framework for understanding this role.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Economics of Imperialism, July 30 2012. ╱ About the author \n\n\nTony Norfield is an economic commentator and author of the book The City: London and the Power of "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/2926575410557707685\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/12\/the-rate-of-profit-finance-imperialism.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2926575410557707685"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2926575410557707685"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/12\/the-rate-of-profit-finance-imperialism.html","title":"The Rate of Profit, Finance \u0026 Imperialism"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-xdlW8-PNjco\/XfUIMrvzoII\/AAAAAAAAFck\/xOWbRU-Jx9ojk94BFbXM8e_EAIQ0HKfVACLcBGAsYHQ\/s72-c\/r%253D.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-9007678827493980102"},"published":{"$t":"2019-10-20T15:58:00.003-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-10-21T04:11:20.086-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"book review"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Michael Roberts"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Piketty"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Capital Not Ideology"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ MICHAEL ROBERTS` ╱ ± 10 minutes\n\n\n\n\n Piketty takes the idealist view that history is a battle of ideologies.\n\n\n\n\n\nAt least, Piketty reckons it is possible to go beyond capitalism in his new book, Capital and Ideology. But Piketty’s plans to “overcome capitalism” will not replace the ownership and control of the means of production with a system of common ownership and control.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: The "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/9007678827493980102\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/10\/capital-not-ideology.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/9007678827493980102"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/9007678827493980102"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/10\/capital-not-ideology.html","title":"Capital Not Ideology"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-RLa4_yCxeBc\/Xa2SQqt1azI\/AAAAAAAAFV4\/PWQ35UJlizEKAW5CRwU5WW_yJhx_mWNMQCLcBGAsYHQ\/s72-c\/piketty.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-560352668627447991"},"published":{"$t":"2019-09-29T05:04:00.005-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-09-29T16:17:26.681-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Apple"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"E. Ahmet Tonak"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Tricontinental"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"A Marxist Analysis of the iPhone"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ E. AHMET TONAK (TRICONTINENTAL INSTITUTE)` ╱ ± 12 minutes\n\n\n\n\n The rate of exploitation is 2458%.\n\n\n\n\n\nWorkers who make iPhones in the 21st century, are twenty-five times more exploited than textile workers in England in the 19th century. Based on a marxist analysis, the current rate of exploitation is 2458%.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Tricontinental Institute, September 2019. ╱ About the author \n\n\nE. Ahmet "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/560352668627447991\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/a-marxist-analysis-of-iphone.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/560352668627447991"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/560352668627447991"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/a-marxist-analysis-of-iphone.html","title":"A Marxist Analysis of the iPhone"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-x-2c8J90RvM\/XZCddLZmR4I\/AAAAAAAAFTM\/NMPaLT61BxE8N0gTW4LqJdPIC8VWQq1iwCLcBGAsYHQ\/s72-c\/iPhoneSVC.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-3792247587479534652"},"published":{"$t":"2019-09-22T13:46:00.002-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-09-23T00:43:47.142-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Paul Cockshott"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Slavery"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Calculating Slave Reparations in Dollars"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ PAUL COCKSHOTT` ╱ ± 10 minutes\n\n\n\n\n The only effective ‘reparation’ that can be made for past exploitation is to socialise all of the economy.\n\n\n\n\n\nYes, we can estimate how much surplus labour was plausibly extracted from slaves in the USA; around ten trillion dollars. But the demand for reparations is by its very nature a bourgeois reform, which presupposes the continuation of private "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/3792247587479534652\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/calculating-slave-reparations-in-dollars.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3792247587479534652"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3792247587479534652"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/calculating-slave-reparations-in-dollars.html","title":"Calculating Slave Reparations in Dollars"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-mdvY5ukskOg\/XYh3q14GeDI\/AAAAAAAAFQk\/EBP6T4eeGWUYzq7HMGUXZNDT7YBuAOEwQCLcBGAsYHQ\/s72-c\/reparations.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-1013788362831934745"},"published":{"$t":"2019-09-15T16:44:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2020-06-23T13:19:20.193-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Branko Milanovic"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Production and then distribution, or distribution and production together"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ BRANKO MILANOVIC` ╱ ± 5 minutes\n\n\n\n\n The neoclassical idea that production and distribution can be neatly separated.\n\n\n\n\n\nIn neo-classical economics, redistribution is regarded as lying outside of economics, in the political domain. The classical view of economics was rather different. It saw production and distribution as a single process.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Global Inequality, August 30, 2019. ╱ About"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/1013788362831934745\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/production-and-then-distribution-or.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1013788362831934745"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1013788362831934745"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/09\/production-and-then-distribution-or.html","title":"Production and then distribution, or distribution and production together"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/--qoK3NSVqiw\/XX9KY1R2_nI\/AAAAAAAAFPs\/F5YJ-dETjEwJmJbYwl2zRUyjPv5E3CQUgCLcBGAsYHQ\/s72-c\/PRODDISTR.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-334674107357951602"},"published":{"$t":"2019-08-26T03:11:00.002-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-08-26T03:17:13.010-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Michael Roberts"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Peterloo"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Political Economy of Peterloo"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ MICHAEL ROBERTS` ╱ ± 10 minutes\n\n\n\n\n 1819 was a year right in the middle of such a Winter.\n\n\n\n\n\nOn the economics of Peterloo (1819), when 60,000 working people gathered to demonstrate in Manchester England for the right to vote and organise at the workplace: the state of the British economy and capitalism at the time.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: The Next Recession, August 16, 2019. ╱ About the author \n\n\nMichael"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/334674107357951602\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/the-political-economy-of-peterloo.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/334674107357951602"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/334674107357951602"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/the-political-economy-of-peterloo.html","title":"The Political Economy of Peterloo"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-I_ARsM74V_s\/XWOZ7OVLbfI\/AAAAAAAAFL8\/AnAUVs-keIQ-7ipFdDGAhYRbVGNlGzm-gCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/Peterloo_Massacre.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-450830526296555830"},"published":{"$t":"2019-08-26T03:11:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-08-27T01:43:08.664-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Chris Dillow"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Current Affairs"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"United Kingdom"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Dubious Logic of Commodification"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ CHRIS DILLOW` ╱ ± 4 minutes\n\n\n\n Raising the pension age is an act of commodification in two different senses.\n\n\n\n\n\nTo understand the Tory's proposal to raise the pension age to 75, we need a Marxian notion – that of commodification. It's aimed at solving the crisis of capitalist profitability and stagnation. Will it work? Not necessarily.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Stumbling and Mumbling (Chris Dillow), August"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/450830526296555830\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/the-dubious-logic-of-commodification.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/450830526296555830"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/450830526296555830"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/the-dubious-logic-of-commodification.html","title":"The Dubious Logic of Commodification"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-hNbqlTM6zbM\/XWOvwUd4AhI\/AAAAAAAAFMU\/dqrLnK_Tzpc_GPAMip9vleGcwb7akzTQACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/pensionage.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-6026494485472760459"},"published":{"$t":"2019-08-12T07:11:00.003-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-08-12T09:56:34.778-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"1917-1989"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Paul Cockshott"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Real Problems of Socialism and Some Answers"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ PAUL COCKSHOTT` ╱ ± 13 minutes\n\n\n\n\n Workplaces will have data that are as good as prices.\n\n\n\n\n\nCould a planning system work in a modern economy with a highly diversified product range? I and others have since the late 80s been arguing that the answer is yes.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Paul Cockshott's Blog, Jan 13, 2017. ╱ About the author \n\n\nPaul Cockshott (1952) is a computer scientist and Marxist political"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/6026494485472760459\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/real-problems-of-socialism-and-some.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/6026494485472760459"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/6026494485472760459"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/08\/real-problems-of-socialism-and-some.html","title":"Real Problems of Socialism and Some Answers"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-ECwB_mb0r7c\/XVFmghfF9AI\/AAAAAAAAFKU\/Fvb3s8BHUl4mUyYrLR5egdwyIgJca3diwCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/berlin-wall-263586_1280%2B%25281%2529.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-7197068680924265416"},"published":{"$t":"2019-04-25T13:58:00.000-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:51:24.100-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"David McNally"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Bureaucratic-Military State vs. Radical Democracy and the Socialist Commons"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ DAVID MCNALLY` ╱ ± 6 minutes\n\n\n\n\n Marx identified the modern state as a suffocating, bureaucratic structure.\n\n\n\n\n\nMarx knew that a workers’ revolution could not succeed if it simply sought “possession” of the bureaucratic state. It would need to be dismantled, superseded . . . “smashed.”\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Progress in Political Economy (PPE), April 16 2019. ╱ About the author \n\n\nDavid McNally is the "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/7197068680924265416\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/04\/the-bureaucratic-military-state-vs.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7197068680924265416"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7197068680924265416"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/04\/the-bureaucratic-military-state-vs.html","title":"The Bureaucratic-Military State vs. Radical Democracy and the Socialist Commons"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-eLo1N5EJmR8\/XMH90OWCM_I\/AAAAAAAAE3w\/v1gIdd8vp9k2C0UndaMJRNjG2ar73v9FACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/Murales_Rivera_-_Treppenhaus_7_Marx.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-1283171531050501036"},"published":{"$t":"2019-03-22T03:54:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-09-29T04:04:25.314-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Apple"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Tony Norfield"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Unequal World"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Imperialism, a Marxist Understanding"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ TONY NORFIELD` ╱ ± 12 minutes\n\n\n\n\n The worst thing to do if you want to make any money is to produce the goods.\n\n\n\n\n\nImperialism benefits imperialist governments and corporations, but also the mass of the populations in the powerful countries. The marxist perspective explains how.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Economics of Imperialism, July 30 2016. ╱ About the author \n\n\nTony Norfield is an economic commentator "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/1283171531050501036\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/imperialism-marxist-understanding.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1283171531050501036"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1283171531050501036"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/imperialism-marxist-understanding.html","title":"Imperialism, a Marxist Understanding"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-Fr5LCpLm3Fo\/XJS-ntXKMPI\/AAAAAAAAEsg\/vdnAjpcRi8UQmHNlCuIpmeXZ2EVe3DmDQCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/Apple_Store_Carrousel_du_Louvre%252C_18_March_2011.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-2627198429646347311"},"published":{"$t":"2019-03-08T03:35:00.003-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:51:23.967-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Cahal Moran"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Top Marx for Pluralism"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ CAHAL MORAN` ╱ ± 7 minutes\n\u003C!-- TOP IMAGE COMES HERE --\u003E\n\n\n\n\n One does not have to buy Marx’s politics to admit that the facts are on his side here.\n\n\n\n\n\nAccording to Marxist theory, the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall (TRPF) leads to recurrent crises under capitalism. It's a helpful device for framing the history of modern capitalism, from the profitability crisis of the 1970s to the "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/2627198429646347311\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/top-marx-for-pluralism.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2627198429646347311"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2627198429646347311"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/top-marx-for-pluralism.html","title":"Top Marx for Pluralism"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-X6enx1B4Yhc\/XII-fJopg0I\/AAAAAAAAEo4\/bii8ptCYaOQdn3lFaQ6CU4EtkB5SY2zIgCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/topmarx2.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-3145956699712408421"},"published":{"$t":"2019-03-08T03:35:00.002-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-03-08T04:09:34.403-08:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Brexit"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Chris Dillow"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Michael Roberts"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Brexit as Symptom"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ CHRIS DILLOW` ╱ ± 5 minutes\n\u003C!-- TOP IMAGE COMES HERE --\u003E\n\n\n\n\n We Marxists stress deeper-rooted failings of capitalism.\n\n\n\n\n\nThere is, I think, a pretty clear line from capitalist stagnation to the 2008 crisis, to austerity and hence to Brexit.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Stumbling and Mumbling (Chris Dillow), Feb 26, 2019. ╱ About the author \n\n\nChris Dillow was born in Leicester in 1963. He went to Wyggeston "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/3145956699712408421\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/brexit-as-symptom.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3145956699712408421"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3145956699712408421"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/03\/brexit-as-symptom.html","title":"Brexit as Symptom"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-KwHs_P11plk\/XIJbb2vVJCI\/AAAAAAAAEp8\/_81xw4nHroUHRGhot0EI_Yx3zqNisOlwwCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/banksybrexit.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-8994213187722999722"},"published":{"$t":"2019-02-09T03:53:00.000-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:51:24.167-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Alex Thomas"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Reading Marx’s Wage-Labour and Capital"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ ALEX M. THOMAS` ╱ ± 6 minutes\n\n\n\n\n Marx intended his writings to be understood by the workers.\n\n\n\n\n\nMainstream (marginalist) economics is built on a harmonious explanation of income distribution. In contrast, Marx argues that wages and profits are inversely related pointing to the fundamental conflict characterising income distribution in a capitalist society.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Alex Thomas, Sep 15 "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/8994213187722999722\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/02\/reading-marxs-wage-labour-and-capital.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8994213187722999722"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8994213187722999722"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/02\/reading-marxs-wage-labour-and-capital.html","title":"Reading Marx’s Wage-Labour and Capital"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-XmyhtMVnOIE\/XF6-LPSLCEI\/AAAAAAAAEiM\/AyTcIfxDrTQBDskOA0MXzngttgcTMa4MwCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/The_daily_job.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-2856868223885832679"},"published":{"$t":"2019-01-18T04:36:00.000-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:51:24.033-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Rosa Luxemburg"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"A Tasteless Stew"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ ROSA LUXEMBURG` ╱ ± 22 minutes\n\n\n\n\n  Made from the leftovers of a hodgepodge of scientific notions.\n\n\n\n\n\nIf it is the task of economics to elucidate the laws regulating the rise of capitalism, then, to be consistent, economics must also discover the laws of the decline of capitalism. Instead, bourgeois professors of economics serve up a tasteless stew ― not intending to explore the real "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/2856868223885832679\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/01\/a-tasteless-stew.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2856868223885832679"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/2856868223885832679"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/01\/a-tasteless-stew.html","title":"A Tasteless Stew"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-1IT6cqFRmKs\/XEHH8WnSEgI\/AAAAAAAAEYo\/Ot1HDfpjDpU7h9njQVbFlcR23wZ46ry8QCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/marshall.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-8127437272304953337"},"published":{"$t":"2019-01-03T23:12:00.000-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2020-06-23T13:20:43.535-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Branko Milanovic"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Marx For Me (And Hopefully For Others Too)"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"✑ BRANKO MILANOVIC` ╱ ± 6 minutes\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n‟Class analysis is absolutely crucial for all students of inequality.\n\n\n\n\n\nOn the inescapable influence of Marx on my work on inequality.\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Global Inequality (12\/28\/'18) ╱ About the author(+)\n\n\nBranko Milanović (1953) is a Serbian-American economist specialized in development and global inequality, formerly lead economist at the World Bank and "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/8127437272304953337\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/01\/marx-for-me-and-hopefully-for-others-too.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8127437272304953337"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8127437272304953337"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2019\/01\/marx-for-me-and-hopefully-for-others-too.html","title":"Marx For Me (And Hopefully For Others Too)"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-z5e0Uf5dXuU\/XC5b-Ytz6DI\/AAAAAAAAERI\/sO3KDVJlezwZ99II4VOeHpHvbf5xDoc8ACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/4902456478_590f59c138_o.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-5555380641439795622"},"published":{"$t":"2018-11-02T03:20:00.000-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:53:53.744-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Asad Zaman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Marxism Revisited"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ ASAD ZAMAN | ± 5 minutes\n\n\n\n‟A shallow caricature of Marxist economics was presented, only to be ridiculed and dismissed.\n\nCurrent neoclassical economists provide no explanation for the observed boom-bust cycle. Repeated cycles of expansions followed by crises is among the central insights of Marxist economics.\n\n\n\n\nOriginally published by The Express Tribune (Sept. 7, 2015). \n\n\n\n\n\nAbout the "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/5555380641439795622\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/11\/marxism-revisited.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/5555380641439795622"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/5555380641439795622"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/11\/marxism-revisited.html","title":"Marxism Revisited"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-dWWvviYia-o\/W9jeoeJX7KI\/AAAAAAAADyI\/6bQytk8sjbsGtC8yYqhOMqjjZ03xWJDywCPcBGAYYCw\/s72-c\/karl-marx-2026379_1280.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-4487257428297897448"},"published":{"$t":"2018-10-26T07:52:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:53:18.957-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"David F. Ruccio"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Sciences of Inequality"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ DAVID F. RUCCIO | ± 7 minutes\n\n\n\n‟There’s a third possibility; a science that combines markets and power and is focused on the role of class.\n\nNeoclassical theory states that everyone gets what they deserve. Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz claims the rich extract rents through market imperfections. Something is missing in all of these theories on economic inequality. An approach that combines"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/4487257428297897448\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/sciences-of-inequality.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/4487257428297897448"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/4487257428297897448"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/sciences-of-inequality.html","title":"Sciences of Inequality"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-qTVtXRcLUr0\/W9D1ThZDgJI\/AAAAAAAADvI\/ou9M4r3IT8sgPdpxfmikn7bRwwtSKFJjwCEwYBhgL\/s72-c\/OnePercentShareOfIncome_TotalUSdebt.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-3910572629733253000"},"published":{"$t":"2018-10-15T04:43:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:51:05.567-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Nick Johnson"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Marx, Keynes, Hayek and Minsky on Economic Crises: Room for Agreement?"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ NICK JOHNSON | ± 12 min\n\n\n\n‟On the theory of why economic crises occur, there is some common ground between them all.\n\n\nOn economic policy, these four influential thinkers part ways. But on the theory of why economic crises occur, there is some common ground between them, in terms of imbalances between production and consumption.\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published by The Political Economy of "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/3910572629733253000\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/marx-keynes-hayek-and-minsky-on.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3910572629733253000"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3910572629733253000"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/marx-keynes-hayek-and-minsky-on.html","title":"Marx, Keynes, Hayek and Minsky on Economic Crises: Room for Agreement?"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-f0IV3paRrts\/W8RfHVveO2I\/AAAAAAAADpI\/RTkR4OPjx9AHnSAOi1usr-m95CEjlu9yQCEwYBhgL\/s72-c\/marxminskykeyneshayek.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-7104995453277423237"},"published":{"$t":"2018-10-15T04:05:00.000-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:52:53.970-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Frederick Engels"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Principles of Communism (in 25 questions and answers). Part II."},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ FREDERICK ENGELS | ± 18 minutes\n\n\n\n‟Above all, it will establish a democratic constitution.\n\n\nWhat is communism? How would if affect society? How can it be achieved? What's the difference between communists and socialists? Frederick Engels, Marx's closest collaborator, answers 25 simple questions on communism.\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published in German in 1847. Extract from Marxists.org ("},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/7104995453277423237\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/the-principles-of-communism-in-25_15.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7104995453277423237"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7104995453277423237"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/the-principles-of-communism-in-25_15.html","title":"The Principles of Communism (in 25 questions and answers). Part II."}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-bO2bI5CVqXk\/W8R2NFB1-_I\/AAAAAAAADpg\/1m4ZXWY1xccPkJkn3mvLPPUGS93kCmcAwCEwYBhgL\/s72-c\/Engels2.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-5872560606481886813"},"published":{"$t":"2018-10-05T08:07:00.001-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:52:53.839-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Frederick Engels"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Principles of Communism (in 25 questions and answers)"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ FREDERICK ENGELS | ± 17 minutes\n\n\n\n‟Abolish competition and replace it with association.\n\n\nWhat is communism? What is the proletariat? What's the effect of periodic economic crises? What's the road to communism? Frederick Engels, Marx's closest collaborator, answers 25 simple questions on communism.\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published in German in 1847. Extract from Marxists.org (translation: "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/5872560606481886813\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/the-principles-of-communism-in-25.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/5872560606481886813"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/5872560606481886813"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/10\/the-principles-of-communism-in-25.html","title":"The Principles of Communism (in 25 questions and answers)"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-DOc0kFZY8Qg\/W7d9pW3hJ5I\/AAAAAAAADoY\/x4l70izbdigGUcuzOlTFn6Zh4LPBgyPOACEwYBhgL\/s72-c\/Engels.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-7111151050858154526"},"published":{"$t":"2018-07-08T03:32:00.003-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:42:45.118-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Big Banks \u0026 Finance"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Dante Dallavalle"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Economics (the science)"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Lessons About Our Roller-Coaster Stockmarket, from a Highly Unlikely Source"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ DANTE DALLAVALLE | 1,219 words\n\n\n\n‟What Minsky lacks in class analysis, Marx and his predecessors more than make up for.\n\n\nTo fully understand financial cycles, look at both Hyman Minsky's analysis of investors' herd-like behavior, but also Karl Marx to understand why investors fear even the most meager increases in wages over the past year.\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published by Alternet (Feb. "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/7111151050858154526\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/07\/lessons-about-our-roller-coaster.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7111151050858154526"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7111151050858154526"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/07\/lessons-about-our-roller-coaster.html","title":"Lessons About Our Roller-Coaster Stockmarket, from a Highly Unlikely Source"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-Etoif4B6H9Y\/W0HIN7G09QI\/AAAAAAAADaE\/u1Txe5FpnIE3wHmj1pozC3i_S1StZSNNwCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/marxminsky.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-1827329541196797486"},"published":{"$t":"2018-05-18T06:39:00.002-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:30:44.920-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Prabhat Patnaik"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Unequal World"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Capitalism, Poverty and Praxis"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n\n✑ PRABHAT PATNAIK | 4,915 words\n\n\n\n‟Globalization entails a resumption of primitive accumulation of capital as in colonial times. \n\n\nGlobalized capitalism does not only lead to growing inequality but also growing absolute poverty, economist Prabhat Patnaik argues. The explanation lies in the concept of primitive accumulation - the dispossession of pre-capitalist petty producers by capitalist "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/1827329541196797486\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/05\/capitalism-poverty-and-praxis.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1827329541196797486"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1827329541196797486"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/05\/capitalism-poverty-and-praxis.html","title":"Capitalism, Poverty and Praxis"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-4YA_xeNrnBU\/WyDzZPbNa8I\/AAAAAAAADVI\/YlWllqQkoZYRhBK3zydNDJ5oT9OZSiIpACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/Screen%2BShot%2B2018-06-13%2Bat%2B12.34.33%2BPM.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-8377299620298550850"},"published":{"$t":"2018-04-20T03:24:00.000-07:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:47:34.806-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Branko Milanovic"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Unequal World"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Will Bourgeoisie Ever Rule The Chinese State?"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ BRANKO MILANOVIĆ | 1,577 words\n\n\n‟There was a strong central government from the start.\n\n\nIn China, the government is helpful to the interests of the bourgeoisie but only so long as these interests do not run contrary to the objectives of the state (that is, of the elite that runs the state). But will Chinese capitalists forever acquiesce to that particular role?\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/8377299620298550850\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/04\/will-bourgeoisie-ever-rule-chinese-state.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8377299620298550850"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8377299620298550850"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/04\/will-bourgeoisie-ever-rule-chinese-state.html","title":"Will Bourgeoisie Ever Rule The Chinese State?"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-Np7gCV02TQ0\/XCd4XFV65EI\/AAAAAAAAENY\/7MtoEu_wSwgVijqXP19fM5d-GI8-iURFACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/BMi.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-4725818667827438942"},"published":{"$t":"2018-03-02T16:42:00.001-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-04-16T02:22:32.308-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Ideals"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Freedom for Whom? Debate with a Libertarian"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ ANDREW KLIMAN | 2,032 words\n\n\n\n\n‟“Free” to find another master to toil under.\n\n\nLibertarians proclaim to be in favour of freedom, and claim free markets deliver it. But Capitalism only replaced old unfreedoms — imposed on the slave by the slave-owner, on the serf by the landowner — with new unfreedoms.\n\n\n\n\n    \n\nOriginally published here by With Sober Senses (October 12, 2016), a publication "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/4725818667827438942\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/03\/freedom-for-whom-debate-with-libertarian.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/4725818667827438942"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/4725818667827438942"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/03\/freedom-for-whom-debate-with-libertarian.html","title":"Freedom for Whom? Debate with a Libertarian"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-kEJCD1AfKc4\/W5vJvkDdu3I\/AAAAAAAADe0\/x-sqE1CzcEsABaSuIhzYcCAVEPol-bNPQCPcBGAYYCw\/s72-c\/AKd.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-3211273908840143160"},"published":{"$t":"2018-01-26T06:44:00.001-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-03-08T03:50:06.134-08:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"feminism"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Tithi Bhattacharya"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Capitalism’s life source: the domestic and social basis for exploitation"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ TITHI BHATTACHARYA | 3,451 words\n\n\n\n‟Unpaid domestic labour of working class women, and the biological capacity of women to give birth, are central to the reproduction of labour power.\n\n\n\nUS-based socialist Tithi Bhattacharya responds to questions from rs21 magazine on her new book about social reproduction theory (SRT). \"SRT shows that social relations outside of the wage labour\/capital "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/3211273908840143160\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/01\/capitalisms-life-source-domestic-and.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3211273908840143160"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/3211273908840143160"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/01\/capitalisms-life-source-domestic-and.html","title":"Capitalism’s life source: the domestic and social basis for exploitation"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-ZMP1IPq0RfE\/Wms-w3qCrOI\/AAAAAAAACtk\/W2Y5l66Am7gng-MnEpGA71JnlYpcu0RaACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/TB.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-1474235884490029794"},"published":{"$t":"2018-01-19T07:56:00.004-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2020-06-28T15:22:20.391-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Current Affairs"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Racism"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Trumpism: A Pre-Existing Condition, Not a Response to Neoliberalism or Globalization"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ ANDREW J. KLIMAN | 5,220 words\n\n\n\n‟There is no evidence that the shift to Trump was a revolt of low-income voters.\n\n\n\"Trumpism is a manifestation of a long-standing white-nationalist strain in US politics\". Kliman provides a list of evidence against the claim from \"“populist” liberals\" that Trumpism is a \"response to neoliberalism or globalization\" and declining incomes. What's more, the Left "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/1474235884490029794\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/01\/trumpism-pre-existing-condition-not.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1474235884490029794"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1474235884490029794"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2018\/01\/trumpism-pre-existing-condition-not.html","title":"Trumpism: A Pre-Existing Condition, Not a Response to Neoliberalism or Globalization"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-INeDjJKzwLU\/WjPU-Eui4ZI\/AAAAAAAACgY\/yWDXyboGwPUbpNBm34rsdvxk6cN1uQZQwCPcBGAYYCw\/s72-c\/AKb2.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-7094230334682633596"},"published":{"$t":"2017-12-15T06:17:00.000-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-06-30T05:54:15.851-07:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Andrew J. Kliman"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"On the Relevance of Marx’s Capital for Today"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ ANDREW J. KLIMAN | 3,226 words\n\n\n\n‟Capital challenges some ideologies that are quite similar to those of our day.\n\n\n\"The grounds on which Capital is typically dismissed as no longer relevant, or of diminished relevance, seem to me not to stand up under scrutiny\", Kliman argues, before discussing the \"many aspects of the book\" that are \"of special relevance today\". For instance, the critique in"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/7094230334682633596\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2017\/12\/on-relevance-of-marxs-capital-for-today.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7094230334682633596"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/7094230334682633596"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2017\/12\/on-relevance-of-marxs-capital-for-today.html","title":"On the Relevance of Marx’s \u003Ci\u003ECapital\u003C\/i\u003E for Today"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-INeDjJKzwLU\/WjPU-Eui4ZI\/AAAAAAAACgU\/qUgyk2pjVt003uDGNFBbL_DvPK1aQ2QoQCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/AKb2.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-8562681736842700254"},"published":{"$t":"2017-12-15T06:15:00.001-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-01-29T09:45:47.802-08:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Eleanor Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Karl Marx II: An Analysis of my Father’s Chief Work"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\n✑ ELEANOR MARX | 2,274 words\n\n\n\n‟The capitalist extracts surplus labour from his workpeople, for which he does not pay.\n\n\nProfits can only result from the \"surplus labor which the capitalist extracts from his workpeople, but for which he does not pay\", Eleanor Marx shows. \"From kings and queens to music-masters and greengrocers, live upon their respective shares of this surplus-value\". In this "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/feeds\/8562681736842700254\/comments\/default","title":"Post Comments"},{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2017\/12\/karl-marx-ii-analysis-of-my-fathers.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8562681736842700254"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/8562681736842700254"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2017\/12\/karl-marx-ii-analysis-of-my-fathers.html","title":"Karl Marx II: An Analysis of my Father’s Chief Work"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-10BrWQVoByM\/XDNFKP9_42I\/AAAAAAAAES8\/XsLg7Z3VTRA2otD580IwZIHaoMQwWbpnwCLcBGAs\/s72-c\/labourpower.png","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892386910911927227.post-1678532689209972160"},"published":{"$t":"2017-12-08T03:43:00.000-08:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2019-01-29T09:46:30.394-08:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Eleanor Marx"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Marx"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Karl Marx I: The briefest sketch of my father’s life"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n✑ ELEANOR MARX | 2,747 words\n\n\n\n‟I shall confine myself to a simple statement of facts. Of his striking personality [...] it is not for me to speak.\n\nImmediately after Karl Marx's death in 1883, his daughter Eleanor took up the task of writing a short \"biography of a great man\", a task which is \"doubly difficult when it falls to one who knew and loved him\".\n\nEleanor Marx (full name: Jenny Julia "},"link":[{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1678532689209972160"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/7892386910911927227\/posts\/default\/1678532689209972160"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/www.socialisteconomist.com\/2017\/12\/karl-marx-i-briefest-sketch-of-my.html","title":"Karl Marx I: The briefest sketch of my father’s life"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Unknown"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"16","height":"16","src":"https:\/\/img1.blogblog.com\/img\/b16-rounded.gif"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-j2CI_4we2ao\/WinTI3UDGGI\/AAAAAAAACeo\/1eNMhcRvmbkuOoj0N-zBcDVebcaSpKLnACLcBGAs\/s72-c\/EM2.png","height":"72","width":"72"}}]}});