About

Another economics is possible. 

SE's mission: to help the world understand economics (capitalism) and believe in a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative (indeed, some kind of socialism).


For too long, a dangerous myth persisted, advocated by the 'there-is-no-alternative' kind of economists and politicians.

The "free enterprise system", Capitalism, is supposedly the only way forward, economist Milton Friedman preached. "There is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary people", he said.

Luckily, many refuse to believe it. They're seeing too many ordinary people suffering from poverty, hunger, health problems or war. Too many people underpaid and overworked, without any meaningful control over their lives. They're seeing too much economic inequality, political oppression and environmental disasters.

They recognize that the economic system is partly to blame for all of these problems, a system in which the few enrich themselves at the expense of the many. They see that there's nothing really "free" in this "free enterprise system" for the majority of the people and desire a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative.

Indeed, some kind of socialist economy.

The opposite of a world in which a minority of wealthy and powerful individuals control economies and governments. A world in which economic wealth and political power is shared much, much more equally among all people of the world. Getting there may feel like a Sisyphean mission and it's a world for which no one has the ultimate blueprint, but it has to be invented nevertheless.

SE does not feign neutrality. It shares this general, socialist ideal.

SE will therefore not only publish economic analyses, but ideas about fundamental solutions and radical alternatives too. To help the world understand economics (capitalism) and believe in a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative.

That said, SE does not feign omniscience either. We try to be undogmatic (do let us know if we fail) and provide a platform for a rich diversity of voices from all over the world.


Contact SE (questions, suggestions, submissions):
☞ join@socialisteconomist.com

Receive SE's updates by:
☞ email (weekly)
☞ rss
☞ facebook
☞ twitter


Write for Socialist Economist

SE welcomes your fearless analyses of economic issues, your radical visions for a better economic future.



Any article (or other type of content) in line with SE's mission is welcome, which is to help the world:
  1. understand economics (capitalism)
  2. Believe in a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative (indeed, some kind of socialism).
Note that SE is non-funded and voluntary-run. But do expect immaterial appreciation from SE's editors and readers for your work! And note that SE would not claim any exclusive copyright and you would be free to publish your article elsewhere too (and SE also accepts texts previously published elsewhere).

Rough guidelines:
  • Length: anything up to around 3000 words.
  • Subject: include economics or economic issues, though, of course, you text may be interdisciplinary.
  • Language: avoid too much academic jargon. Non-academics and non-economists should be able to understand (most of) your article as well.
Send your drafts to: join@socialisteconomist.com



Comments

  1. Michael Hudson's recently posted article on $4.3 trillion bailout of the banks by the Fed is actually a low end estimate. If one includes the Fed's resale of new bonds as the prior bonds matured, during the period 2008-16, then the Fed provided QE in the amount of somewhere between $5-$6 trillion in bailout. And don't forget the $300 billion in underwriting of Citigroup and Bank of America in 2008-09, which were technically bankrupt at the time. Or the special auctions to bail mutual funds and other shadow banks. Or the $200 billion or so of TARP money for mid-sized banks, or the $180b for AIG, and another $90b for finance arms of GM and GE. Or the Fed's $29b to Chase to scoop up Bear Stearns, or the FDIC cost to cover deposits at WaMu, or the Treasury's $300b bailout of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, etc. etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this comment. You're invited to add your comment below Hudson's article as well: http://www.socialisteconomist.com/2018/09/the-lehman-10th-anniversary-spin-as.html

      Delete

Post a Comment

Your thoughts...

donate3

Donate Now! No, not your money...
Help this voluntary-run platform compete in the so-called marketplace of ideas (where our competitors have somewhat larger marketing budgets).

Donate: Advertisement, by sharing SE's content online and offline, with close friends and distant acquaintances. Content, by writing for SE or commenting on articles.

CAT


About

Another economics is possible.
SE's mission: to help the world understand economics (capitalism) and believe in a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative (indeed, some kind of socialism).
Read more about us here.



Follow

Stay updated through facebook, twitter, rss, or simply visit this website each weekend (SE publishes on Fridays). Subscribe to SE's weekly email update here:



Topics

to help you browse through our content
 


 
Current Affairs

⇩ more current affairs
 
Unequal World

⇩ more unequal world
 
Big Banks & Finance

⇩ more big banks
 
Economics (the science)

⇩ more economics (the science)
 
Ideals

⇩ more ideals
 
Marx

⇩ more marx
 
1917-1989 (The Red Century)

⇩ more 1917-1989

BOTTOMBOX
















Other visitors:



subscribetop3