About

Another economics is possible. 

SE's mission: to analyse economics (capitalism) and look for a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative (indeed, some kind of socialism).


For too long, a dangerous myth persisted, advocated by the 'there-is-no-alternative' kind of economists and politicians.

The "free enterprise system", Capitalism, is supposedly the only way forward, economist Milton Friedman preached. "There is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary people", he said.

Luckily, many people refuse to believe it. They're seeing too many ordinary people suffering from poverty, hunger, health problems or war. Too many people underpaid and overworked, without any meaningful control over their lives. They're seeing too much economic inequality, environmental disasters and political oppression, and recognize that there's no real freedom in this "free enterprise system" for the majority of the people. They recognize that the economic system is partly to blame for all of these problems, a system in which the few enrich themselves at the expense of the many.

They desire a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative. Indeed, some kind of socialist economy. A world in which economic wealth and political power is shared much, much more equally among all people of the world. Getting there may feel like a Sisyphean mission, and it's a world for which no one has the ultimate blueprint. Luckily, that hasn't stopped socialists from trying.

SE does not feign neutrality. It shares this general, socialist ideal.

SE will therefore not only publish economic analyses, but ideas about fundamental solutions and radical economic alternatives too. SE's mission is to analyse economics (capitalism) and look for a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative.

SE does not feign omniscience. We intend to be undogmatic (do let us know if we fail) and provide a platform for a rich diversity of voices from all over the world.


Contact SE (questions, suggestions, submissions):
☞ join@socialisteconomist.com

Receive SE's updates by:
☞ email (weekly)
☞ rss
☞ facebook
☞ twitter


Submissions

SE welcomes your submissions. Your analyses of past or present economic issues, your visions for a better economic future.



Any article (or other type of content) in line with SE's mission is welcome, which is to:
  1. Analyse economics (capitalism)
  2. Look for a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative (indeed, some kind of socialism).
Note that SE is non-funded and voluntary-run and does not pay its contributors. Also note that SE would not claim any exclusive copyright and you would be free to publish your article elsewhere too (and SE also accepts content previously published elsewhere).

Guidelines:
  • Length: anything under 3000 words. Longer articles may be published in separate parts.
  • Subject: related to economic issues. Of course, you text may cover other fields (politics, culture, etcetera) as well, but SE tries to maintain a focus on economic issues.
  • Language: try to avoid jargon. Non-academics and non-economists should be able to understand (most of) your article as well.
Send your draft, including a short bio and picture of yourself, to: join@socialisteconomist.com




Comments

  1. Michael Hudson's recently posted article on $4.3 trillion bailout of the banks by the Fed is actually a low end estimate. If one includes the Fed's resale of new bonds as the prior bonds matured, during the period 2008-16, then the Fed provided QE in the amount of somewhere between $5-$6 trillion in bailout. And don't forget the $300 billion in underwriting of Citigroup and Bank of America in 2008-09, which were technically bankrupt at the time. Or the special auctions to bail mutual funds and other shadow banks. Or the $200 billion or so of TARP money for mid-sized banks, or the $180b for AIG, and another $90b for finance arms of GM and GE. Or the Fed's $29b to Chase to scoop up Bear Stearns, or the FDIC cost to cover deposits at WaMu, or the Treasury's $300b bailout of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, etc. etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this comment. You're invited to add your comment below Hudson's article as well: http://www.socialisteconomist.com/2018/09/the-lehman-10th-anniversary-spin-as.html

      Delete

Post a Comment

Your thoughts...





Stay Updated


to SE's weekly
e-mail update


    








Also Read










Topics


 
more current affairs


more unequal world


more big banks


more economics (the science)


more ideals


more marx


more 1917-1989












Another economics is possible.

SE's mission: to analyse economics (capitalism), and
look for a fair, egalitarian, democratic and green alternative
(indeed, some kind of socialism).

Read more about SE here.





Contributors




Avatar
Ghosh
Avatar
Milanovic
Avatar
Henwood
Avatar
Patnaik
Avatar
Hahnel
Avatar
Shaikh
Avatar
Hudson
Avatar
Kliman
Avatar
Ruccio
Avatar
Samary
Avatar
Patnaik
Avatar
Huber
Avatar
Zaman
Avatar
Rasmus
Avatar
Bockman
Avatar
Norfield







SE welcomes your submissions.

Your analyses of past or present economic issues.

Your visions for a better economic future.

See how to submit here.








SE is a platform, open to a diversity of views from thinkers from across the globe.
Views expressed in articles on SE do not necessarily reflect the views of SE's editors.