Utopia and the Right to be Lazy

✑ DAVID F. RUCCIO | 1,001 words
‟The idea of a world without work has returned.

Mainstream economists "preach the virtues of work" and across the world "the capitalist work ethic prevails". However, "the world of work, already satirized by LaFargue and others in the nineteenth century, clearly no longer works", David Ruccio argues.

Dr. David F. Ruccio is a renowned marxian economist, professor of economics at the University of Notre Dame, where he has taught since 1982. He is also a member of the Higgins Labor Studies Program and the Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. He blogstweets, and contributes to the journal Rethinking Marxism (which he edited for twelve years), Real World Economics Review and Democracy at Work.

Originally published on Ruccio's personal blog (Jan. 24, 2018).

S tudents are much too busy to think these days. So, when a junior comes to talk with me about the possibility of my directing their senior thesis, I ask them about their topic — and then their schedule. I explain to them that, if they really want to do a good project, they’re going to have to quit half the things they’re involved in.

They look at me as if I’m crazy. “Really?! But I’ve signed up for all these interesting clubs and volunteer projects and intramural sports and. . .” I then patiently explain that, to have the real learning experience of a semester or year of independent study, they need time, a surplus of time. They need to have the extra time in their lives to get lost in the library or to take a break with a friend, to read and to daydream. In other words, they need to have the right to be lazy.

So does everyone else.

As it turns out, that’s exactly what Paul LaFargue argued, in a scathing attack on the capitalist work ethic, “The Right To Be Lazy,” back in 1883.

‟Capitalist ethics, a pitiful parody on Christian ethics, strikes with its anathema the flesh of the laborer; its ideal is to reduce the producer to the smallest number of needs, to suppress his joys and his passions and to condemn him to play the part of a machine turning out work without respite and without thanks.

And LaFargue criticized both economists (who “preach to us the Malthusian theory, the religion of abstinence and the dogma of work”) and workers themselves (who invited the “miseries of compulsory work and the tortures of hunger” and need instead to forge a brazen law forbidding any man to work more than three hours a day, the earth, the old earth, trembling with joy would feel a new universe leaping within her”).

Today, nothing seems to have changed. Workers (or at least those who claim to champion the cause of workers) demand high-paying jobs and full employment, while mainstream economists (from Casey Mulligan, John Taylor, and Greg Mankiw to Dani Rodrick and Brad DeLong) promote what they consider to be the dignity of work and worry that, even as the official unemployment rate has declined in recent years, the labor-force participation rate in the United States has fallen dramatically and remains much too low.

Mainstream economists and their counterparts in the world of politics and policymaking — both liberals and conservatives — never cease to preach the virtues of work and in every domain, from minimum-wage legislation to economic growth, seek to promote more people getting more jobs to perform more work.

This is particularly true in the United States and the United Kingdom, where the “work ethic” remains particularly strong. The number of hours worked per year has fallen in all advanced countries since the middle of the twentieth century but, as is clear from the chart above, in comparison with France and Germany, the average has declined by much less in America and Britain.

Today, according to the OECD, American and British workers spend much more time working per year (1765 and 1675 hours, respectively) than their French and German counterparts (1474 and 1371 hours, respectively).

But in all four countries — and, really, across the entire world — the capitalist work ethic prevails. Workers are exhorted to search for or keep their jobs, even as wage increases fall far short of productivity growth, inequality (already obscene) continues to rise, new forms of automation threaten to displace or destroy a wage range of occupations, unions and other types of worker representation have been undermined, and digital work increasingly permeates workers’ leisure hours.

The world of work, already satirized by LaFargue and others in the nineteenth century, clearly no longer works.

Not surprisingly, the idea of a world without work has returned. According to Andy Beckett, a new generation of utopian academics and activists are imagining a “post-work” future.

‟Post-work may be a rather grey and academic-sounding phrase, but it offers enormous, alluring promises: that life with much less work, or no work at all, would be calmer, more equal, more communal, more pleasurable, more thoughtful, more politically engaged, more fulfilled – in short, that much of human experience would be transformed.

To many people, this will probably sound outlandish, foolishly optimistic – and quite possibly immoral. But the post-workists insist they are the realists now. “Either automation or the environment, or both, will force the way society thinks about work to change,” says David Frayne, a radical young Welsh academic whose 2015 book The Refusal of Work is one of the most persuasive post-work volumes. “So are we the utopians? Or are the utopians the people who think work is going to carry on as it is?”

I’m willing to keep the utopian label for the post-work thinkers precisely because they criticize the world of work — as neither natural nor particularly old — and extend that critique to the dictatorial powers and assumptions of modern employers, thus opening a path to consider other ways of organizing the world of work. Most importantly, post-work thinking creates the possibility of criticizing the labor involved in exploitation and thus of creating the conditions whereby workers no longer need to succumb to or adhere to the distinction between necessary and surplus labor.

In this sense, the folks working toward a post-work future are the contemporary equivalent of the “communist physiologists, hygienists and economists” LaFargue hoped would be able to

‟convince the proletariat that the ethics inoculated into it is wicked, that the unbridled work to which it has given itself up for the last hundred years is the most terrible scourge that has ever struck humanity, that work will become a mere condiment to the pleasures of idleness, a beneficial exercise to the human organism, a passion useful to the social organism only when wisely regulated and limited to a maximum of three hours a day; this is an arduous task beyond my strength.

That’s the utopian impulse inherent in the right to be lazy.

Economic, leftist, independent, straightforward, undogmatic. Read more about SE here.

Through facebook, twitterrss, by visiting this website each weekend (we publish on Fridays), or, even better:

to help you browse through our content ↴

Current Affairs

The News on the Economy: It’s Not What It Should Be
DEAN BAKER ╱ Feb. 17, 2018 ╱ 5,268 words

About that Stock Panic
DOUG HENWOOD ╱ Feb. 10, 2018 ╱ 2,248 words
more current affairs (click)

The Current Conflict In Spain Has A Lot to Do With Economic Failure
MARK WEISBROTNov. 10, 2017 1,319 words

Catalonia: The Problems and Errors of the Independence Movement
Nov. 10, 2017 2,824 words

Catalonia: A Democratic Opportunity
MIREIA VEHÍ & ALBERT NOGUERA ╱ Nov. 10, 2017 ╱ 2,642 words

Puerto Rico: When It Rains, It Pours
MICHAEL ROBERTS ╱ Oct. 20, 2017 ╱ 2,265 words

Global Power

The CFA Franc: French Monetary Imperialism in Africa
NDONGO SAMBA SYLLA ╱ Feb. 10, 2018 ╱ 1,489 words

Monetary Imperialism
MICHAEL HUDSON ╱ Feb. 2, 2018 ╱ 3,391 words
more global power (click)

What About China?
IMMANUEL WALLERSTEINDec. 1, 20179,69 words

The Demise of the Third World Agenda
VIJAY PRASHAD ╱ Nov. 3, 2017 ╱ 1,459 words

Globalization and the End of the Labor Aristocracy
JAYATI GHOSH ╱ Oct. 13, 2017 ╱ 4,999 words

Big Banks & Finance

About that Stock Panic
DOUG HENWOOD ╱ Feb. 10, 2018 ╱ 2,248 words

The CFA Franc: French Monetary Imperialism in Africa
NDONGO SAMBA SYLLA ╱ Feb. 10, 2018 ╱ 1,489 words
more big banks (click)

Monetary Imperialism
MICHAEL HUDSON ╱ Feb. 2, 2018 ╱ 3,391 words

The Shifting Battleground
ASAD ZAMAN ╱ Dec. 22, 2017 ╱ 1,035 words

Puerto Rico: When It Rains, It Pours
MICHAEL ROBERTS ╱ Oct. 20, 2017 ╱ 2,265 words

1917-1989 (The Red Century)

Markets in the Name of Socialism. An Interview with Johanna Bockman
JOHANNA BOCKMANJan. 5, 20183,634 words
more 1917-1989 (click)

The Red and the Black
SETH ACKERMANNov. 17, 20178,365 words

How the USSR Radically Reduced Inequality, Even Among its Adversaries
DAVID F. RUCCIOOct. 27, 20171,848 words


Utopia - without classes
DAVID F. RUCCIO ╱ Feb. 17, 2018 ╱ 803 words

Utopia and the Right to be Lazy
DAVID F. RUCCIO ╱ Feb. 10, 2018 ╱ 1,001 words
more ideals (click)

The Red and the Black
SETH ACKERMAN ╱ Nov. 17, 2017 ╱ 8,365 words

What Should We Demand from Our Economy?
ROBIN ERIC HAHNELOct. 7, 201713,789 words


Capitalism’s life source: the domestic and social basis for exploitation
TITHI BHATTACHARYAJan. 26, 20183,451 words

more marxists (click)

On the Relevance of Marx’s Capital for Today
ANDREW J. KLIMANDec. 15, 20173,226 words

Karl Marx II: An Analysis of my Father’s Chief Work
ELEANOR MARXDec. 15, 20172,274 words

Karl Marx I: The briefest sketch of my father’s life
ELEANOR MARXDec. 8, 20172,747 words

Others reading Socialist Economist

SE's content, when republished from other sources or when containing original content, may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the original source.

SE has relied on content from:
Pluto Press / Dollars & Sense / The Next Recession / Anticap / Rethinking Marxism / The New Press / Público / Revolting Europe / CUP / Alternet / Jacobin / IWallerstein / Marxists Internet Archive / With Sober Senses / WEA Pedagogy Blog / Rebel News / Counterpunch / Review of African Political Economy / Left Business Observer / Center for Economic and Policy Research /

Contact us: join@socialisteconomist.com