Class And Optimism

✑ CHRIS DILLOW` ╱ ± 3 minutes
Posh folk are more optimistic than others.

Hard times in our formative years make us pessimistic long after those times have passed. Which is where class comes in. Being posh insulates you somewhat from hard times.

Chris Dillow was born in Leicester in 1963. He went to Wyggeston Boys School (a grammar), Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and the University of Manchester. He then drifted into the City for a few years before joining the Investors Chronicle, though he strenuously denies accusations that he's a journalist. Chris lives alone in Belsize Park, and blogs at Stumbling and Mumbling. On twitter: @CJFDillow.

One thing that attracts people to Boris Johnson is his cheerfulness about Britain’s prospects. Liam Halligan and Owen Patterson both praise his “sunny optimism”, whilst Matthew Leeming writes – I kid ye not – that “we need a cheerleader to remind us we are an erect and manly people.” But I wonder: is there a class aspect here?

I ask because of recent paper by Erin McGuire. She shows that:

Individuals who begin their lives by observing an economic downturn remain pessimistic and risk averse with respect to investments over the course of their lifetimes.

This corroborates work (pdf) by Ulrike Malmendier and Stefan Nagel and by (pdf) Miguel Ampudia and Michael Ehrmann. And it’s consistent with research by Henrik Cronqvist and colleagues. They show that people who grew up in poorer homes or who entered the labour market in recession tend to avoid growth stocks even years later.

Much the same might also be true for attitudes to unemployment. Memories of the Great Depression suppressed wage militancy in the 1950s, just as memories of the financial crisis might have caused millennials to be timid today. Wolfgang Maennig and Markus Wilhelm have shown that spells of unemployment depress well-being even after people return to work, perhaps by inducing the fear that it could happen again.

All this suggests that hard times in our formative years make us pessimistic long after those times have passed.

Which is where class comes in. Being posh insulates you somewhat from hard times, thus making you more optimistic than the rest of us. Johnson and I are both of an age to have spent our formative years during a time of soaring unemployment. But whereas I saw it close up, Mr J did so from a safer distance. It is perhaps therefore no accident that he has a “sunny optimism” and I, well, don’t.
The mechanism here was described by David Hume. Our lived experience creates impressions which enter our minds “ with most force and violence”, whereas reports are only “faint impressions” of these. Those who have experienced poverty or unemployment, or seen them close up, have therefore a greater fear of it than those who only saw them from a distance, if that.

What I’m describing here is a little different from the tendency for posh people to be more confident than the rest of us, but perhaps connected. My point is that posh folk are more optimistic than others not just about their personal prospects, but about prospects for the economy generally. Of course, you can think of counter-examples to this – of posh but melancholic people (Townes van Zandt?) – but I suspect there is a tendency here. This fits with the fact that leading Brexiters such as Rees-Mogg and Farage as well as Johnson come disproportionately from comfortable backgrounds.

Of course, optimism is sometimes justified. But this isn’t my point. My point is merely that our attitudes and preferences are not “given” as simplistic neoclassical economics often pretends. They are instead endogenous (pdf) , shaped by among other things culture , gender , history , peer pressure and – yes – class.

Top image: Protesters against Margaret Thatcher. From: Stumbling & Mumbling.


Stay Updated

to SE's weekly
e-mail update


Also Read


more current affairs

more unequal world

more big banks

more economics (the science)

more ideals

more marx

more 1917-1989

Exploring alternatives.

Is SE "socialist"? SE is not anything, except
convinced of the need for a fundamental, global,
open debate about capitalism and possible fair,
egalitarian, democratic and greener alternatives,
from an economic perspective.

Read more about SE here.



SE welcomes your submissions.

Your analyses of past or present economic issues.

Your visions for a better economic future.

See how to submit here.

SE is a platform, open to a diversity of views from thinkers from across the globe.
Views expressed in articles on SE do not necessarily reflect the views of SE's editors.